GOLS vs IVV
Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GOLS or IVV?
GOLS costs less.
GOLS has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GOLS | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.00%Best | 0.03% |
| AUM | $35M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 48 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +4.74% | +12.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% |
| Top 10 Weight | 59.0% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 2, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
GOLS vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GOLS vs IVV Performance
Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF (GOLS) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, GOLS is up 4.74% versus a gain of 12.51% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GOLS charges 0.00% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $0 vs $3 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GOLS currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
14.2% of GOLS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.6% of IVV's money is in holdings GOLS also owns.
GOLS and IVV share little of their money.
7 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in GOLS and 505 in IVV, against full books of 48 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 488 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for GOLS (98.7% of the fund), and 13 for GOLS that do not appear in IVV (59.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GOLS | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| DISWalt Disney Co | 3.85% | 0.27% | 3.58% |
| TKOTko Group Holdings Inc | 3.83% | 0.02% | 3.81% |
| FOXFox Corp. Class B | 2.30% | 0.01% | 2.29% |
| TTWOTake-Two Interactive Software, Inc. | 1.65% | 0.06% | 1.59% |
| CMCSAComcast Corp. Class A | 1.16% | 0.13% | 1.03% |
| NKENike Inc | 0.78% | 0.08% | 0.70% |
| LYVLive Nation Entertainment Inc | 0.59% | 0.04% | 0.55% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GOLS and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GOLS or IVV?
GOLS has an expense ratio of 0.00% while IVV charges 0.03%. GOLS is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between GOLS and IVV?
14.2% of GOLS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.6% of IVV's is in holdings GOLS also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in GOLS and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, GOLS or IVV?
GOLS yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than GOLS?
GOLS has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.