GOLS vs QQQ
Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, GOLS or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
GOLS has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GOLS | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.00%Best | 0.18% |
| AUM | $35M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 48 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +5.19% | +15.18%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +19.65% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.60% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.94% |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jan 2, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
GOLS vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GOLS vs QQQ Performance
Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF (GOLS) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, GOLS is up 5.19% versus a gain of 15.18% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GOLS charges 0.00% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $0 vs $18 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GOLS currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings GOLS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for GOLS, our book for it covers 85.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
2 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in GOLS and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 48 and 107.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GOLS and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GOLS or QQQ?
GOLS has an expense ratio of 0.00% while QQQ charges 0.18%. GOLS is the cheaper option, by $18 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, GOLS or QQQ?
GOLS yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than GOLS?
GOLS has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.