GQRE vs VTI
FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GQRE | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $421M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.18% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 197 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +10.25% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.66% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.26% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.09% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Flexshares Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 5, 2013 | May 24, 2001 |
GQRE vs VTI Performance
FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE) is a ETF from Flexshares Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GQRE returned +11.66% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, GQRE is up 10.25% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, GQRE compounded at +12.26% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +2.09% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs +3.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GQRE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.0% for GQRE and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GQRE charges 0.45% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GQRE currently yields 4.18% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GQRE and VTI share 44 holdings out of 2879 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GQRE or VTI?
GQRE has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GQRE or VTI?
Over the past year GQRE returned +11.66% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), GQRE annualized +3.38% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GQRE or VTI?
GQRE has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GQRE -42.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GQRE and VTI?
GQRE and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GQRE and VTI?
GQRE and VTI share 44 common holdings with a 1.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2879 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GQRE or VTI?
GQRE yields 4.18% while VTI yields 1.07%, so GQRE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.