GRF vs VXUS
GRF vs VXUS
Eagle Capital Growth Fund Inc. vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GRF | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.61% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $40M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.59% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 26 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -3.09% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.84% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.47% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.71% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 123.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -91.1% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Eagle Capital Growth Fund Inc. | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 2, 1990 | Jan 26, 2011 |
GRF vs VXUS Performance
Eagle Capital Growth Fund Inc. (GRF) is a ETF from Eagle Capital Growth Fund Inc. and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GRF returned +12.84% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, GRF is down 3.09% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, GRF compounded at +12.47% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +9.71% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.86% annualized vs +1.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GRF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 123.6% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -91.1% for GRF and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.01. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GRF charges 1.61% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $161 vs $5 annually, a gap of $156 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GRF currently yields 8.59% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
GRF and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7883 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GRF or VXUS?
GRF has an expense ratio of 1.61% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $156 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GRF or VXUS?
Over the past year GRF returned +12.84% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), GRF annualized +1.56% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GRF or VXUS?
GRF has been the more volatile fund at 123.6% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: GRF -91.1% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both GRF and VXUS?
GRF and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.01, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GRF and VXUS?
GRF and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7883 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GRF or VXUS?
GRF yields 8.59% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so GRF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.