GRF vs VOO
Eagle Capital Growth Fund Inc. vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GRF or VOO?
VOO has been ahead.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GRF | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.61% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $40M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.34% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 26 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -4.30% | +12.25%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.67% | +17.03%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.30% | +21.25%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.45% | +13.08%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 65.2% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -71.1% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,432 | $18,490Best |
| Fund Family | Eagle Capital Growth Fund Inc. | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 2, 1990 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 17, 2026 (16 years).
GRF vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.
GRF vs VOO Performance
Eagle Capital Growth Fund Inc. (GRF) is an ETF from Eagle Capital Growth Fund Inc. and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GRF returned +6.67% while VOO returned +17.03%. Year to date, GRF is down 4.30% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, GRF compounded at +5.30% per year against +21.25% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +4.45% and +13.08% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.38% annualized vs +10.09%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GRF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 65.2% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -71.1% for GRF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.08. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GRF charges 1.61% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $161 vs $3 annually, a gap of $158 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GRF currently yields 8.34% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
At least 12.4% of VOO's money is in holdings GRF also owns.
Stated as a floor: for GRF, our book for it covers 87.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
VOO and GRF share little of their money.
19 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in GRF and 494 in VOO, against full books of 26 and 509.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GRF | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 12.95% | 1.46% | 11.49% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 8.88% | 3.24% | 5.64% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.44% | 4.13% | 0.31% |
| ITWIllinois Tool Works Inc. | 3.92% | 0.12% | 3.80% |
| ORLYO'Eilly Automotive, Inc. | 3.65% | 0.11% | 3.54% |
| BENFranklin Resources Inc. | 3.45% | 0.02% | 3.43% |
| AZOAutozone Inc Snr S* Ice | 3.31% | 0.08% | 3.23% |
| SYKStryker Corp 3.375 11/25 | 2.93% | 0.17% | 2.76% |
| SBUXStarbucks Corp | 2.54% | 0.19% | 2.35% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.62% | 0.96% | 0.66% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GRF and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GRF or VOO?
GRF has an expense ratio of 1.61% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $158 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GRF or VOO?
Over the past year GRF returned +6.67% vs +17.03% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), GRF annualized +10.09% vs +13.38% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GRF or VOO?
GRF has been the more volatile fund at 65.2% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: GRF -71.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both GRF and VOO?
GRF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.08, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GRF and VOO?
At least 12.4% of VOO's money is in holdings GRF also owns. Our book for GRF is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in GRF and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, GRF or VOO?
GRF yields 8.34% while VOO yields 1.04%, so GRF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than GRF?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.