GRF vs VOO

Quick Verdict

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOOMore Diversified: VOO

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGRFVOOWinner
Expense Ratio1.61%0.03%
AUM$40M$979.0B
Dividend Yield8.59%1.09%
Holdings26509
YTD Return-3.09%+13.80%
1Y Return+12.84%+23.71%
3Y Return (annualized)+12.47%+21.50%
5Y Return (annualized)+9.71%+13.44%
Volatility (annualized)123.6%14.1%
Max Drawdown-91.1%-34.3%
Fund FamilyEagle Capital Growth Fund Inc.Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJul 2, 1990Sep 7, 2010

GRF vs VOO Performance

Eagle Capital Growth Fund Inc. (GRF) is a ETF from Eagle Capital Growth Fund Inc. and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GRF returned +12.84% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, GRF is down 3.09% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.

Over three years, GRF compounded at +12.47% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.71% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +1.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

GRF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 123.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -91.1% for GRF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.05. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GRF charges 1.61% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $161 vs $3 annually, a gap of $158 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GRF currently yields 8.59% against 1.09% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

11.7%overlap

GRF and VOO share 19 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 11.7% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in GRFWeight in VOODifference
BRK.B12.95%1.42%11.53%
GOOGL8.88%3.25%5.63%
AMZN4.44%3.62%0.82%
ITWProProPro
ORLYProProPro
BENProProPro
AZOProProPro
SYKProProPro
SBUXProProPro
JNJProProPro
See all 10 holdings GRF shares with VOO
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GRF or VOO?

GRF has an expense ratio of 1.61% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $158 per year of difference.

Which performed better, GRF or VOO?

Over the past year GRF returned +12.84% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), GRF annualized +1.56% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, GRF or VOO?

GRF has been the more volatile fund at 123.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: GRF -91.1% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both GRF and VOO?

GRF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.05, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between GRF and VOO?

GRF and VOO share 19 common holdings with a 11.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, GRF or VOO?

GRF yields 8.59% while VOO yields 1.09%, so GRF currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →