GSEE vs VTI
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GSEE delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GSEE | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.36% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $137M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.26% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 2,010 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +19.38% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.53% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.49% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.33% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -37.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 12, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
GSEE vs VTI Performance
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GSEE returned +32.53% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, GSEE is up 19.38% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, GSEE compounded at +21.49% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.33% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, GSEE has the edge at +12.47% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GSEE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.5% for GSEE and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GSEE charges 0.36% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $36 vs $3 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GSEE currently yields 2.26% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GSEE or VTI?
GSEE has an expense ratio of 0.36% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $33 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GSEE or VTI?
Over the past year GSEE returned +32.53% vs +22.35% for VTI, so GSEE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), GSEE annualized +12.47% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GSEE or VTI?
GSEE has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GSEE -37.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GSEE and VTI?
GSEE and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GSEE and VTI?
GSEE and VTI share 2 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 4006 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GSEE or VTI?
GSEE yields 2.26% while VTI yields 1.07%, so GSEE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.