GSEE vs VYM

GSEE vs VYM
See what your portfolio actually owns
Your funds unpacked, overlap, fees and score, free on screen. The full report is $25, once. Download sample.
X-ray my portfolio free

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. GSEE delivered stronger 1-year returns. GSEE offers more diversification with 2,010 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: GSEEMore Diversified: GSEE

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGSEEVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.36%0.04%
AUM$137M$81.6B
Dividend Yield2.26%2.24%
Holdings2,010616
YTD Return+18.32%+14.66%
1Y Return+31.19%+22.16%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.09%+18.72%
5Y Return (annualized)+8.45%+12.18%
Volatility (annualized)16.5%14.6%
Max Drawdown-37.5%-58.8%
Fund FamilyGoldman Sachs Asset ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 12, 2020Nov 10, 2006

GSEE vs VYM Performance

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GSEE returned +31.19% while VYM returned +22.16%. Year to date, GSEE is up 18.32% versus a gain of 14.66% for VYM.

Over three years, GSEE compounded at +21.09% per year against +18.72% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +8.45% and +12.18% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, GSEE has the edge at +12.32% annualized vs +7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

GSEE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.5% for GSEE and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GSEE charges 0.36% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $36 vs $4 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GSEE currently yields 2.26% against 2.24% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

0.1%overlap

GSEE and VYM share 1 holdings out of 1823 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in GSEEWeight in VYMDifference
HAL0.07%0.12%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GSEE or VYM?

GSEE has an expense ratio of 0.36% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.

Which performed better, GSEE or VYM?

Over the past year GSEE returned +31.19% vs +22.16% for VYM, so GSEE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), GSEE annualized +12.32% vs +7.01% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, GSEE or VYM?

GSEE has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GSEE -37.5% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both GSEE and VYM?

GSEE and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between GSEE and VYM?

GSEE and VYM share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1823 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, GSEE or VYM?

GSEE yields 2.26% while VYM yields 2.24%, so GSEE currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See what your portfolio actually owns
Your funds unpacked, overlap, fees and score, free on screen. The full report is $25, once. Download sample.
X-ray my portfolio free