GSIG vs QQQ
Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
GSIG has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. GSIG offers more diversification with 510 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GSIG | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.08% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $9M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.35% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 510 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +0.30% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.17% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.16% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.06% | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.1% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -9.6% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 7, 2020 | Mar 10, 1999 |
GSIG vs QQQ Performance
Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year GSIG returned +4.17% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, GSIG is up 0.30% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, GSIG compounded at +5.16% per year against +25.96% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +2.06% and +14.54% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +1.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 3.1% for GSIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.6% for GSIG and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GSIG charges 0.08% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $18 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GSIG currently yields 4.35% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
GSIG and QQQ share 1 holdings out of 555 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GSIG | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| KDP | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GSIG or QQQ?
GSIG has an expense ratio of 0.08% while QQQ charges 0.18%. GSIG is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $10 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GSIG or QQQ?
Over the past year GSIG returned +4.17% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), GSIG annualized +1.91% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GSIG or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 3.1% for GSIG. Worst drawdown: GSIG -9.6% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both GSIG and QQQ?
GSIG and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GSIG and QQQ?
GSIG and QQQ share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 555 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GSIG or QQQ?
GSIG yields 4.35% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so GSIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.