GSIG vs QQQ
Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, GSIG or QQQ?
Investment Grade Bond against Large Cap Growth.
GSIG has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GSIG | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.08%Best | 0.18% |
| AUM | $9M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.35% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 510 | 107 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.1%Best | 20.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -9.6%Best | -35.1% |
| $10,000 over 5.9 years | $11,181 | $29,292Best |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Investment Grade Bond | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jul 7, 2020 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 107 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. GSIG has data through Jun 3, 2026 and QQQ through Sep 18, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 5.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 9, 2020 to Jun 3, 2026 (5.9 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.5% compared with 3.1% for GSIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.6% for GSIG and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GSIG charges 0.08% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $18 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GSIG currently yields 4.35% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.2% of QQQ's money is in holdings GSIG also owns.
Stated as a floor: for GSIG, our book for it covers 82.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
The two holdings books were reported 97 days apart, GSIG as of Apr 30, 2026 and QQQ as of Aug 5, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 454 positions we hold weights for in GSIG and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 510 and 107.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GSIG | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| KDPKeurig Dr Pepper Inc (kdp Us) | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.18% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GSIG and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GSIG or QQQ?
GSIG has an expense ratio of 0.08% while QQQ charges 0.18%. GSIG is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, GSIG or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.5% annualized versus 3.1% for GSIG. Worst drawdown: GSIG -9.6% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both GSIG and QQQ?
GSIG and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GSIG or QQQ?
GSIG yields 4.35% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so GSIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than GSIG?
GSIG has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.