GSIG vs VYM
Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GSIG | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.08% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $9M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.35% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 510 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +0.30% | +16.78% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.17% | +24.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.16% | +18.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.06% | +12.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.1% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -9.6% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 7, 2020 | Nov 10, 2006 |
GSIG vs VYM Performance
Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GSIG returned +4.17% while VYM returned +24.43%. Year to date, GSIG is up 0.30% versus a gain of 16.78% for VYM.
Over three years, GSIG compounded at +5.16% per year against +18.60% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +2.06% and +12.30% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.11% annualized vs +1.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 3.1% for GSIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.6% for GSIG and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GSIG charges 0.08% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $4 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GSIG currently yields 4.35% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
GSIG and VYM share 3 holdings out of 1009 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GSIG or VYM?
GSIG has an expense ratio of 0.08% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GSIG or VYM?
Over the past year GSIG returned +4.17% vs +24.43% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), GSIG annualized +1.91% vs +7.11% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GSIG or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 3.1% for GSIG. Worst drawdown: GSIG -9.6% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both GSIG and VYM?
GSIG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GSIG and VYM?
GSIG and VYM share 3 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1009 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GSIG or VYM?
GSIG yields 4.35% while VYM yields 2.86%, so GSIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.