GUMI vs VOO

GUMI vs VOO

Which is better, GUMI or VOO?

VOO has been ahead.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGUMIVOO
Expense Ratio0.16%0.03%Best
AUM$60M$997.4B
Dividend Yield2.67%1.04%
Holdings188509
YTD Return+1.71%+12.50%Best
1Y Return+2.61%+17.58%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.27%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.95%
Volatility (annualized)0.5%Best12.2%
Max Drawdown-0.5%Best-18.7%
$10,000 over 2.1 years$10,666$14,476Best
Fund FamilyGoldman Sachs Asset ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
Style-Large Cap Blend
InceptionJul 25, 2024Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 25, 2024 to Sep 11, 2026 (2.1 years).

GUMI vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.

GUMI vs VOO Performance

Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GUMI returned +2.61% while VOO returned +17.58%. Year to date, GUMI is up 1.71% versus a gain of 12.50% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.2% compared with 0.5% for GUMI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -0.5% for GUMI and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.16. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GUMI charges 0.16% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $16 vs $3 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GUMI currently yields 2.67% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 43 holdings in GUMI and 505 in VOO, totalling 16.8% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 43 positions we hold weights for in GUMI and 505 in VOO, against full books of 188 and 509.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of GUMI and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

GUMIVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GUMI or VOO?

GUMI has an expense ratio of 0.16% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $13 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, GUMI or VOO?

Over the past year GUMI returned +2.61% vs +17.58% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GUMI annualized +3.12% vs +19.26% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, GUMI or VOO?

VOO has been the more volatile fund at 12.2% annualized versus 0.5% for GUMI. Worst drawdown: GUMI -0.5% vs VOO -18.7%.

Should I hold both GUMI and VOO?

GUMI and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.16, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, GUMI or VOO?

GUMI yields 2.67% while VOO yields 1.04%, so GUMI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than GUMI?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.