GUMI vs VXUS
Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GUMI | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.16% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $50M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.77% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 218 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +1.40% | +15.00% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.71% | +26.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 0.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -0.5% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 25, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
GUMI vs VXUS Performance
Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GUMI returned +2.71% while VXUS returned +26.87%. Year to date, GUMI is up 1.40% versus a gain of 15.00% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 0.5% for GUMI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -0.5% for GUMI and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.05. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GUMI charges 0.16% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $16 vs $5 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GUMI currently yields 2.77% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
GUMI and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7901 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GUMI or VXUS?
GUMI has an expense ratio of 0.16% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $11 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GUMI or VXUS?
Over the past year GUMI returned +2.71% vs +26.87% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GUMI annualized +3.10% vs +4.88% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GUMI or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 0.5% for GUMI. Worst drawdown: GUMI -0.5% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both GUMI and VXUS?
GUMI and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.05, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GUMI and VXUS?
GUMI and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7901 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GUMI or VXUS?
GUMI yields 2.77% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so GUMI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.