HAPS vs IVV
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. HAPS delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HAPS | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.61% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $171M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.47% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 202 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +22.06% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.36% | +23.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.59% | +21.49% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.43% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -27.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Harbor Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 27, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
HAPS vs IVV Performance
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS) is a ETF from Harbor Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year HAPS returned +34.36% while IVV returned +23.70%. Year to date, HAPS is up 22.06% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, HAPS compounded at +13.59% per year against +21.49% for IVV. Across the full 3-year window we track, HAPS has the edge at +14.14% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HAPS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.4% for HAPS and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HAPS charges 0.61% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $3 annually, a gap of $58 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HAPS currently yields 0.47% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
HAPS and IVV share 1 holdings out of 699 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HAPS | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NUVL | 0.35% | 0.62% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HAPS or IVV?
HAPS has an expense ratio of 0.61% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $58 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HAPS or IVV?
Over the past year HAPS returned +34.36% vs +23.70% for IVV, so HAPS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), HAPS annualized +14.14% vs +7.05% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HAPS or IVV?
HAPS has been the more volatile fund at 19.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: HAPS -27.4% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both HAPS and IVV?
HAPS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HAPS and IVV?
HAPS and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 699 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HAPS or IVV?
HAPS yields 0.47% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.