HAPS vs VTI
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. HAPS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HAPS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.61% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $171M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.47% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 202 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +22.06% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.36% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.59% | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -27.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Harbor Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 27, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
HAPS vs VTI Performance
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS) is a ETF from Harbor Funds and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HAPS returned +34.36% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, HAPS is up 22.06% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Over three years, HAPS compounded at +13.59% per year against +21.12% for VTI. Across the full 3-year window we track, HAPS has the edge at +14.14% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HAPS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.4% for HAPS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HAPS charges 0.61% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $3 annually, a gap of $58 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HAPS currently yields 0.47% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
HAPS and VTI share 134 holdings out of 2844 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HAPS or VTI?
HAPS has an expense ratio of 0.61% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $58 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HAPS or VTI?
Over the past year HAPS returned +34.36% vs +24.16% for VTI, so HAPS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), HAPS annualized +14.14% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HAPS or VTI?
HAPS has been the more volatile fund at 19.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: HAPS -27.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both HAPS and VTI?
HAPS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HAPS and VTI?
HAPS and VTI share 134 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2844 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HAPS or VTI?
HAPS yields 0.47% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.