HAPS vs QQQ
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. HAPS delivered stronger 1-year returns. HAPS offers more diversification with 195 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HAPS | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.61% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $171M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.47% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 202 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +21.84% | +17.46% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.55% | +26.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.15% | +25.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.4% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -27.4% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Harbor Funds | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 27, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
HAPS vs QQQ Performance
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS) is a ETF from Harbor Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year HAPS returned +34.55% while QQQ returned +26.02%. Year to date, HAPS is up 21.84% versus a gain of 17.46% for QQQ.
Over three years, HAPS compounded at +14.15% per year against +25.51% for QQQ. Across the full 3-year window we track, HAPS has the edge at +14.03% annualized vs +13.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 19.4% for HAPS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.4% for HAPS and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HAPS charges 0.61% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $18 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HAPS currently yields 0.47% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
HAPS and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 298 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HAPS or QQQ?
HAPS has an expense ratio of 0.61% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $43 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HAPS or QQQ?
Over the past year HAPS returned +34.55% vs +26.02% for QQQ, so HAPS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), HAPS annualized +14.03% vs +13.08% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HAPS or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 19.4% for HAPS. Worst drawdown: HAPS -27.4% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both HAPS and QQQ?
HAPS and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HAPS and QQQ?
HAPS and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 298 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HAPS or QQQ?
HAPS yields 0.47% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so HAPS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.