HCOM vs SBIO
HCOM vs SBIO
Hartford Schroders Commodity Strategy ETF vs ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF
Quick Verdict
SBIO has a lower expense ratio. SBIO delivered stronger 1-year returns. SBIO offers more diversification with 105 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HCOM | SBIO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.50% | |
| AUM | $9M | $202M | |
| Dividend Yield | 10.95% | 4.05% | |
| Holdings | 55 | 87 | |
| YTD Return | +0.71% | +34.80% | |
| 1Y Return | -4.90% | +106.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -6.95% | +32.77% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.56% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.7% | 29.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -28.8% | -63.1% | |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | ALPS Advisors | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 14, 2021 | Dec 30, 2014 |
HCOM vs SBIO Performance
Hartford Schroders Commodity Strategy ETF (HCOM) is a ETF from Hartford Funds and ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF (SBIO) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors. Over the past year HCOM returned -4.90% while SBIO returned +106.24%. Year to date, HCOM is up 0.71% versus a gain of 34.80% for SBIO.
Over three years, HCOM compounded at -6.95% per year against +32.77% for SBIO. Across the full 4-year window we track, SBIO has the edge at +9.80% annualized vs +0.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SBIO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.6% compared with 14.7% for HCOM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.8% for HCOM and -63.1% for SBIO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.25. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HCOM charges 0.59% per year while SBIO charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $50 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HCOM currently yields 10.95% against 4.05% for SBIO.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HCOM or SBIO?
HCOM has an expense ratio of 0.59% while SBIO charges 0.50%. SBIO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $9 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HCOM or SBIO?
Over the past year HCOM returned -4.90% vs +106.24% for SBIO, so SBIO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), HCOM annualized +0.68% vs +9.80% for SBIO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HCOM or SBIO?
SBIO has been the more volatile fund at 29.6% annualized versus 14.7% for HCOM. Worst drawdown: HCOM -28.8% vs SBIO -63.1%.
Should I hold both HCOM and SBIO?
HCOM and SBIO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.25, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, HCOM or SBIO?
HCOM yields 10.95% while SBIO yields 4.05%, so HCOM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.