HTUS vs IVV
Hull Tactical US ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HTUS | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.96% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $154M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.23% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 21 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +15.98% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.02% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.99% | +21.77% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.32% | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Hull Tactical Asset Allocation, LLC | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2015 | May 15, 2000 |
HTUS vs IVV Performance
Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) is a ETF from Hull Tactical Asset Allocation, LLC and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year HTUS returned +13.02% while IVV returned +23.01%. Year to date, HTUS is up 15.98% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, HTUS compounded at +17.99% per year against +21.77% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +6.32% and +13.39% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +5.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HTUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.7% for HTUS and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HTUS charges 0.96% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $96 vs $3 annually, a gap of $93 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HTUS currently yields 1.23% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
HTUS and IVV share 0 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HTUS or IVV?
HTUS has an expense ratio of 0.96% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $93 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HTUS or IVV?
Over the past year HTUS returned +13.02% vs +23.01% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), HTUS annualized +5.65% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HTUS or IVV?
HTUS has been the more volatile fund at 16.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: HTUS -50.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both HTUS and IVV?
HTUS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HTUS and IVV?
HTUS and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HTUS or IVV?
HTUS yields 1.23% while IVV yields 1.09%, so HTUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.