HTUS vs VTI
Hull Tactical US ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HTUS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.96% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $154M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.23% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 21 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +15.60% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.06% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.46% | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.29% | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Hull Tactical Asset Allocation, LLC | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2015 | May 24, 2001 |
HTUS vs VTI Performance
Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) is a ETF from Hull Tactical Asset Allocation, LLC and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HTUS returned +13.06% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, HTUS is up 15.60% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Over three years, HTUS compounded at +17.46% per year against +21.12% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +6.29% and +12.37% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs +5.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HTUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.2% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.7% for HTUS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HTUS charges 0.96% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $96 vs $3 annually, a gap of $93 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HTUS currently yields 1.23% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
HTUS and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2785 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HTUS or VTI?
HTUS has an expense ratio of 0.96% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $93 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HTUS or VTI?
Over the past year HTUS returned +13.06% vs +24.16% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), HTUS annualized +5.63% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HTUS or VTI?
HTUS has been the more volatile fund at 16.2% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: HTUS -50.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both HTUS and VTI?
HTUS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HTUS and VTI?
HTUS and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2785 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HTUS or VTI?
HTUS yields 1.23% while VTI yields 1.07%, so HTUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.