HUSV vs NMI
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF vs Nuveen Municipal Income Fund Inc.
Quick Verdict
HUSV has a lower expense ratio. NMI delivered stronger 1-year returns. HUSV offers more diversification with 101 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HUSV | NMI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.73% | |
| AUM | $74M | - | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.37% | 4.57% | |
| Holdings | 101 | 220 | |
| YTD Return | +7.92% | +11.00% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.19% | +14.29% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.65% | +9.76% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.95% | +2.10% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2% | 11.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.7% | -34.4% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Nuveen | |
| Category | Equity | Tax Preferred | |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2016 | Apr 20, 1988 |
HUSV vs NMI Performance
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF (HUSV) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Nuveen Municipal Income Fund Inc. (NMI) is a ETF from Nuveen. Over the past year HUSV returned +5.19% while NMI returned +14.29%. Year to date, HUSV is up 7.92% versus a gain of 11.00% for NMI.
Over three years, HUSV compounded at +9.65% per year against +9.76% for NMI; over five years the annualized figures are +5.95% and +2.10% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, HUSV has the edge at +8.44% annualized vs +0.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HUSV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.2% compared with 11.0% for NMI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.7% for HUSV and -34.4% for NMI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.14. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HUSV charges 0.70% per year while NMI charges 0.73%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $73 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HUSV currently yields 1.37% against 4.57% for NMI.
Holdings Overlap
HUSV and NMI share 0 holdings out of 196 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HUSV or NMI?
HUSV has an expense ratio of 0.70% while NMI charges 0.73%. HUSV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HUSV or NMI?
Over the past year HUSV returned +5.19% vs +14.29% for NMI, so NMI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), HUSV annualized +8.44% vs +0.37% for NMI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HUSV or NMI?
HUSV has been the more volatile fund at 13.2% annualized versus 11.0% for NMI. Worst drawdown: HUSV -35.7% vs NMI -34.4%.
Should I hold both HUSV and NMI?
HUSV and NMI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.14, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HUSV and NMI?
HUSV and NMI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 196 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HUSV or NMI?
HUSV yields 1.37% while NMI yields 4.57%, so NMI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.