HUSV vs IVV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, HUSV or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. HUSV is less concentrated, with 26.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HUSV | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $57M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.27% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 204 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +6.20% | +13.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.25% | +20.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.44% | +21.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.60% | +12.88%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2%Best | 15.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.7% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,132 | $18,327Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 26.7%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2016 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 25, 2016 to Sep 4, 2026 (10 years).
HUSV vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10 years both funds cover.
HUSV vs IVV Performance
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF (HUSV) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year HUSV returned +3.25% while IVV returned +20.08%. Year to date, HUSV is up 6.20% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.
Over three years, HUSV compounded at +9.44% per year against +21.29% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +5.60% and +12.88% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.29% annualized vs +8.21%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 13.2% for HUSV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.7% for HUSV and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HUSV charges 0.70% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HUSV currently yields 1.27% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
98.1% of HUSV's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 28.9% of IVV's money is in holdings HUSV also owns.
Most of HUSV is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
99 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in HUSV and 505 in IVV, against full books of 204 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 399 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for HUSV (70.5% of the fund), and 0 for HUSV that do not appear in IVV (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HUSV | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.81% | 6.86% | 4.05% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 2.89% | 5.44% | 2.55% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 3.56% | 0.72% | 2.84% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 1.66% | 1.43% | 0.23% |
| GENGen Digital Inc | 3.03% | 0.02% | 3.01% |
| VRSNVerisign Inc. | 2.95% | 0.04% | 2.91% |
| ROPRoper Technologies Inc. | 2.64% | 0.06% | 2.58% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 2.13% | 0.51% | 1.62% |
| TDYTeledyne Technologies Inc | 2.54% | 0.05% | 2.49% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.66% | 0.93% | 0.73% |
98.1% of HUSV is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HUSV or IVV?
HUSV has an expense ratio of 0.70% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, HUSV or IVV?
Over the past year HUSV returned +3.25% vs +20.08% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), HUSV annualized +8.21% vs +14.29% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, HUSV or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 13.2% for HUSV. Worst drawdown: HUSV -35.7% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both HUSV and IVV?
HUSV and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between HUSV and IVV?
98.1% of HUSV's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 28.9% of IVV's is in holdings HUSV also owns. They hold 99 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in HUSV and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, HUSV or IVV?
HUSV yields 1.27% while IVV yields 1.10%, so HUSV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than HUSV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. HUSV is less concentrated, with 26.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.