HYP vs IVV
Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, HYP or IVV?
All Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. HYP is less concentrated, with 26.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HYP | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $70M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.12% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 61 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +17.45%Best | +12.98% |
| 1Y Return | +15.16% | +16.69%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.02% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.61% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 35.1% | 13.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -28.8% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $11,450 | $11,650Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 26.4%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | Golden Eagle Strategies, LLC | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 23, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 23, 2025 to Sep 28, 2026 (1 years).
HYP vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
HYP vs IVV Performance
Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP) is an ETF from Golden Eagle Strategies, LLC and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year HYP returned +15.16% while IVV returned +16.69%. Year to date, HYP is up 17.45% versus a gain of 12.98% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HYP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.1% compared with 13.2% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.8% for HYP and -8.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HYP charges 0.85% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HYP currently yields 0.12% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
17.5% of HYP's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 2.6% of IVV's money is in holdings HYP also owns.
HYP and IVV share little of their money.
10 positions in common, counted across the 60 positions we hold weights for in HYP and 490 in IVV, against full books of 61 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 472 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for HYP (96.0% of the fund), and 41 for HYP that do not appear in IVV (67.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HYP | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| DELLDell Technologies Inc | 2.75% | 0.20% | 2.55% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 2.61% | 0.16% | 2.45% |
| WDCWestern Digital Corp Company Guar 11/28 3 | 2.51% | 0.23% | 2.28% |
| LITELumentum Holdings Inc | 2.37% | 0.11% | 2.26% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.18% | 1.16% | 0.02% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Group Ltd. | 1.62% | 0.28% | 1.34% |
| VLOValero Energy | 1.19% | 0.16% | 1.03% |
| PSXPhillips 66 | 1.12% | 0.15% | 0.97% |
| TERTeradyne Inc - Common | 1.09% | 0.08% | 1.01% |
| HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise Co | 1.04% | 0.10% | 0.94% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of HYP and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HYP or IVV?
HYP has an expense ratio of 0.85% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, HYP or IVV?
Over the past year HYP returned +15.16% vs +16.69% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), HYP annualized +14.50% vs +16.50% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, HYP or IVV?
HYP has been the more volatile fund at 35.1% annualized versus 13.2% for IVV. Worst drawdown: HYP -28.8% vs IVV -8.9%.
Should I hold both HYP and IVV?
HYP and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between HYP and IVV?
17.5% of HYP's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 2.6% of IVV's is in holdings HYP also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 60 positions we hold weights for in HYP and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, HYP or IVV?
HYP yields 0.12% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than HYP?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. HYP is less concentrated, with 26.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.