HYRM vs IVV
Xtrackers Risk Managed USD High Yield Strategy ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, HYRM or IVV?
High Yield Bond against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HYRM | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 6.36% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 2 | 508 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.1%Best | 16.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.4%Best | -22.1% |
| $10,000 over 4.2 years | $12,045 | $17,223Best |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | High Yield Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 10, 2022 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 127 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. HYRM has data through May 7, 2026 and IVV through Sep 11, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 10, 2022 to May 7, 2026 (4.2 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 8.1% for HYRM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.4% for HYRM and -22.1% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HYRM charges 0.30% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HYRM currently yields 6.36% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in HYRM and 505 in IVV, totalling 99.4% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 217 days apart, HYRM as of Dec 31, 2025 and IVV as of Aug 5, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in HYRM and 505 in IVV, against full books of 2 and 508.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of HYRM and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HYRM or IVV?
HYRM has an expense ratio of 0.30% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, HYRM or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 8.1% for HYRM. Worst drawdown: HYRM -12.4% vs IVV -22.1%.
Should I hold both HYRM and IVV?
HYRM and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, HYRM or IVV?
HYRM yields 6.36% while IVV yields 1.06%, so HYRM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than HYRM?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.