IBAT vs QQQ
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, IBAT or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. IBAT led over 1Y, QQQ over the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBAT | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $63M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.75% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 97 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +23.74%Best | +16.56% |
| 1Y Return | +16.65%Best | +13.92% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +28.03% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.12% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.1% | 17.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -27.9% | -22.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.6 years | $14,841 | $16,190Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 56.7% | 46.7%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Mar 19, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 21, 2024 to Oct 26, 2026 (2.6 years).
IBAT vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.6 years both funds cover.
IBAT vs QQQ Performance
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IBAT returned +16.65% while QQQ returned +13.92%. Year to date, IBAT is up 23.74% versus a gain of 16.56% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IBAT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.1% compared with 17.7% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.9% for IBAT and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBAT charges 0.47% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $18 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBAT currently yields 0.75% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
3.1% of IBAT's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 0.9% of QQQ's money is in holdings IBAT also owns.
IBAT and QQQ share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 83 positions we hold weights for in IBAT and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 97 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 93 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for IBAT (96.3% of the fund), and 16 for IBAT that do not appear in QQQ (25.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IBAT | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares | 3.10% | 0.91% | 2.19% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IBAT and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBAT or QQQ?
IBAT has an expense ratio of 0.47% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IBAT or QQQ?
Over the past year IBAT returned +16.65% vs +13.92% for QQQ, so IBAT leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IBAT or QQQ?
IBAT has been the more volatile fund at 30.1% annualized versus 17.7% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: IBAT -27.9% vs QQQ -22.8%.
Should I hold both IBAT and QQQ?
IBAT and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IBAT and QQQ?
3.1% of IBAT's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 0.9% of QQQ's is in holdings IBAT also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 83 positions we hold weights for in IBAT and 101 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBAT or QQQ?
IBAT yields 0.75% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so IBAT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than IBAT?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. IBAT led over 1Y, QQQ over the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.