IBAT vs VTI
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, IBAT or VTI?
IBAT has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IBAT led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBAT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $67M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.75% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 98 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +37.24%Best | +12.30% |
| 1Y Return | +44.32%Best | +16.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.6% | 12.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -27.9% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $16,474Best | $14,908 |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.3% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 19, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 21, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.5 years).
IBAT vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.
IBAT vs VTI Performance
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IBAT returned +44.32% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, IBAT is up 37.24% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IBAT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.6% compared with 12.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.9% for IBAT and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBAT charges 0.47% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $3 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBAT currently yields 0.75% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
26.4% of IBAT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.8% of VTI's money is in holdings IBAT also owns.
IBAT and VTI share little of their money.
15 positions in common, counted across the 82 positions we hold weights for in IBAT and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 98 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,142 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for IBAT (96.7% of the fund), and 3 for IBAT that do not appear in VTI (0.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IBAT | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| APDAir Products & Chemicals Inc. | 6.98% | 0.09% | 6.89% |
| BECfd Bloom Energy Corp- A | 6.93% | 0.08% | 6.85% |
| ETNEaton Corp Plc | 3.50% | 0.22% | 3.28% |
| LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares | 3.25% | 0.31% | 2.94% |
| ENSEnersys | 1.42% | 0.01% | 1.41% |
| ENPHEnphase Energy Inc Common Stock | 1.01% | 0.01% | 1.00% |
| QSQuantumscape Corp | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.61% |
| PLUGPlug Power Inc | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.60% |
| DOWDow Inc. | 0.56% | 0.03% | 0.53% |
| ENTGEntegris Inc Common Stock Usd 0.01 | 0.52% | 0.03% | 0.49% |
26.4% of IBAT is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBAT or VTI?
IBAT has an expense ratio of 0.47% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $44 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IBAT or VTI?
Over the past year IBAT returned +44.32% vs +16.08% for VTI, so IBAT leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IBAT or VTI?
IBAT has been the more volatile fund at 29.6% annualized versus 12.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IBAT -27.9% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both IBAT and VTI?
IBAT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IBAT and VTI?
26.4% of IBAT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.8% of VTI's is in holdings IBAT also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 82 positions we hold weights for in IBAT and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBAT or VTI?
IBAT yields 0.75% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than IBAT?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IBAT led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.