IBAT vs VTI
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IBAT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBAT | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $71M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.80% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 99 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +36.71% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +61.53% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -27.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 19, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
IBAT vs VTI Performance
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IBAT returned +61.53% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, IBAT is up 36.71% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IBAT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.9% for IBAT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBAT charges 0.47% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $3 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBAT currently yields 0.80% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
IBAT and VTI share 12 holdings out of 2858 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBAT or VTI?
IBAT has an expense ratio of 0.47% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IBAT or VTI?
Over the past year IBAT returned +61.53% vs +21.39% for VTI, so IBAT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IBAT annualized +22.71% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IBAT or VTI?
IBAT has been the more volatile fund at 29.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IBAT -27.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IBAT and VTI?
IBAT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IBAT and VTI?
IBAT and VTI share 12 common holdings with a 0.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2858 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBAT or VTI?
IBAT yields 0.80% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.