IBHH vs VTI
iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, IBHH or VTI?
High Yield Bond against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IBHH is less concentrated, with 16.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBHH | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $452M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 6.20% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 216 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -1.44% | +12.28%Best |
| 1Y Return | -0.64% | +16.78%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.55% | +20.89%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.94% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.5%Best | 16.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.1%Best | -22.4% |
| $10,000 over 4.5 years | $11,904 | $18,551Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 16.5%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | High Yield Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 8, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 10, 2022 to Sep 17, 2026 (4.5 years).
IBHH vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.5 years both funds cover.
IBHH vs VTI Performance
iShares iBonds 2028 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHH) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IBHH returned -0.64% while VTI returned +16.78%. Year to date, IBHH is down 1.44% versus a gain of 12.28% for VTI.
Over three years, IBHH compounded at +6.55% per year against +20.89% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.0% compared with 7.5% for IBHH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.1% for IBHH and -22.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBHH charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBHH currently yields 6.20% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 194 holdings in IBHH and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 96.8% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 194 positions we hold weights for in IBHH and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 216 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,149 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for IBHH (97.5% of the fund), and 192 for IBHH that do not appear in VTI (96.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IBHH and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBHH or VTI?
IBHH has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IBHH or VTI?
Over the past year IBHH returned -0.64% vs +16.78% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IBHH or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 16.0% annualized versus 7.5% for IBHH. Worst drawdown: IBHH -12.1% vs VTI -22.4%.
Should I hold both IBHH and VTI?
IBHH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBHH or VTI?
IBHH yields 6.20% while VTI yields 1.03%, so IBHH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than IBHH?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IBHH is less concentrated, with 16.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.