IEV vs VTI

IEV vs VTI

Which is better, IEV or VTI?

Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IEV is less concentrated, with 21.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTILess Concentrated: IEV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIEVVTI
Expense Ratio0.60%0.03%Best
AUM$1.6B$690.1B
Dividend Yield2.71%1.03%
Holdings3773,524
YTD Return+3.77%+13.35%Best
1Y Return+9.63%+15.92%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+18.30%+23.41%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+9.43%+12.83%Best
Volatility (annualized)18.2%15.3%Best
Max Drawdown-65.6%-56.6%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$15,692$18,286Best
Top 10 Weight21.2%Best33.3%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJul 25, 2000May 24, 2001

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 31, 2001 to Oct 2, 2026 (25.3 years).

IEV vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 25.3 years both funds cover.

IEV vs VTI Performance

iShares Europe ETF (IEV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IEV returned +9.63% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, IEV is up 3.77% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.

Over three years, IEV compounded at +18.30% per year against +23.41% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +9.43% and +12.83% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.06% annualized vs +3.66%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IEV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.2% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -65.6% for IEV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IEV charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IEV currently yields 2.71% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

IEV already in VTI2.8%
VTI already in IEV0.5%

2.8% of IEV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.5% of VTI's money is in holdings IEV also owns.

IEV and VTI share little of their money.

4 positions in common, counted across the 360 positions we hold weights for in IEV and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 377 and 3,524.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,147 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for IEV (96.9% of the fund), and 9 for IEV that do not appear in VTI (5.9%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IEVWeight in VTIDifference
ROPRoper Technologies Inc.2.09%0.05%2.04%
MRKMerck & Company Inc0.14%0.45%0.31%
DGDollar General Corp.0.46%0.04%0.42%
FBKFb Financial Corp0.12%0.00%0.12%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IEV and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IEVVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IEV or VTI?

IEV has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IEV or VTI?

Over the past year IEV returned +9.63% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), IEV annualized +3.66% vs +8.06% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, IEV or VTI?

IEV has been the more volatile fund at 18.2% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IEV -65.6% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both IEV and VTI?

IEV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between IEV and VTI?

2.8% of IEV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.5% of VTI's is in holdings IEV also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 360 positions we hold weights for in IEV and 3,463 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, IEV or VTI?

IEV yields 2.71% while VTI yields 1.03%, so IEV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than IEV?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IEV is less concentrated, with 21.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.