IGF vs SCHD
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, IGF or SCHD?
SCHD has been ahead.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IGF is less concentrated, with 39.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IGF | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.37% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $10.4B | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.96% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 98 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +4.12% | +24.23%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.94% | +27.90%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.91% | +15.55%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.59% | +9.97%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.0% | 13.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -42.1% | -33.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,807 | $16,083Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 39.3%Best | 41.8% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 10, 2007 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 20, 2011 to Sep 17, 2026 (14.9 years).
IGF vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.9 years both funds cover.
IGF vs SCHD Performance
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year IGF returned +7.94% while SCHD returned +27.90%. Year to date, IGF is up 4.12% versus a gain of 24.23% for SCHD.
Over three years, IGF compounded at +14.91% per year against +15.55% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +9.59% and +9.97% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.30% annualized vs +5.36%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IGF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.0% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.1% for IGF and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IGF charges 0.37% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $37 vs $6 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IGF currently yields 2.96% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
2.1% of IGF's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 1.5% of SCHD's money is in holdings IGF also owns.
IGF and SCHD share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 76 positions we hold weights for in IGF and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 98 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 98 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for IGF (98.5% of the fund), and 26 for IGF that do not appear in SCHD (38.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IGF | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| OKEOneok Inc. | 2.14% | 1.47% | 0.67% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IGF and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IGF or SCHD?
IGF has an expense ratio of 0.37% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IGF or SCHD?
Over the past year IGF returned +7.94% vs +27.90% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), IGF annualized +5.36% vs +11.30% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IGF or SCHD?
IGF has been the more volatile fund at 14.0% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: IGF -42.1% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both IGF and SCHD?
IGF and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IGF and SCHD?
2.1% of IGF's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 1.5% of SCHD's is in holdings IGF also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 76 positions we hold weights for in IGF and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, IGF or SCHD?
IGF yields 2.96% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than IGF?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IGF is less concentrated, with 39.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.