IGF vs VOO

Quick Verdict

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOOMore Diversified: VOO

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIGFVOOWinner
Expense Ratio0.39%0.03%
AUM$10.9B$979.0B
Dividend Yield2.90%1.09%
Holdings98509
YTD Return+7.97%+13.80%
1Y Return+12.56%+23.71%
3Y Return (annualized)+15.80%+21.50%
5Y Return (annualized)+10.37%+13.44%
Volatility (annualized)16.5%14.1%
Max Drawdown-59.5%-34.3%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionDec 10, 2007Sep 7, 2010

IGF vs VOO Performance

iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IGF returned +12.56% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, IGF is up 7.97% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.

Over three years, IGF compounded at +15.80% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +10.37% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +2.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IGF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.5% for IGF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IGF charges 0.39% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IGF currently yields 2.90% against 1.09% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

1.9%overlap

IGF and VOO share 17 holdings out of 566 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.9% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IGFWeight in VOODifference
NEE4.75%0.28%4.47%
WMB2.97%0.14%2.83%
SO2.82%0.17%2.65%
DUKProProPro
KMIProProPro
CEGProProPro
AEPProProPro
TRGPProProPro
OKEProProPro
SREProProPro
See all 10 holdings IGF shares with VOO
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
X-ray my whole portfolio$99/yr Pro · 7-day refund

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IGF or VOO?

IGF has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IGF or VOO?

Over the past year IGF returned +12.56% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), IGF annualized +2.29% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IGF or VOO?

IGF has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: IGF -59.5% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both IGF and VOO?

IGF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between IGF and VOO?

IGF and VOO share 17 common holdings with a 1.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 566 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IGF or VOO?

IGF yields 2.90% while VOO yields 1.09%, so IGF currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

X-ray your whole portfolio
$99/yr7-day refund. ETFs, mutual funds, 401(k)s.
Get Pro →