IGF vs IVV
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, IGF or IVV?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IGF | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.37% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $10.4B | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.96% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 98 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +4.12% | +12.27%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.94% | +17.04%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.91% | +21.24%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.59% | +13.08%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5% | 15.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -59.5% | -54.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,807 | $18,490Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 39.3% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 10, 2007 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 12, 2007 to Sep 17, 2026 (18.8 years).
IGF vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 18.8 years both funds cover.
IGF vs IVV Performance
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IGF returned +7.94% while IVV returned +17.04%. Year to date, IGF is up 4.12% versus a gain of 12.27% for IVV.
Over three years, IGF compounded at +14.91% per year against +21.24% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +9.59% and +13.08% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.55% annualized vs +2.08%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IGF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 15.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.5% for IGF and -54.7% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IGF charges 0.37% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $37 vs $3 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IGF currently yields 2.96% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
33.3% of IGF's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 1.8% of IVV's money is in holdings IGF also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
17 positions in common, counted across the 76 positions we hold weights for in IGF and 490 in IVV, against full books of 98 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 465 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for IGF (96.8% of the fund), and 10 for IGF that do not appear in IVV (7.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IGF | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEENextera Energy Inc | 4.75% | 0.26% | 4.49% |
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 3.25% | 0.14% | 3.11% |
| SOSouthern Co. | 2.75% | 0.15% | 2.60% |
| DUKDuke Energy Corp | 2.64% | 0.14% | 2.50% |
| CEGConstellation Energy Corporation Com | 2.43% | 0.13% | 2.30% |
| KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de | 2.24% | 0.10% | 2.14% |
| TRGPTarga Resources Corp Preferred | 2.24% | 0.10% | 2.14% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 2.14% | 0.09% | 2.05% |
| AEPAmerican Electric Power Co Inc | 1.88% | 0.10% | 1.78% |
| DDominion Energy Inc. | 1.60% | 0.09% | 1.51% |
33.3% of IGF is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IGF or IVV?
IGF has an expense ratio of 0.37% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $34 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IGF or IVV?
Over the past year IGF returned +7.94% vs +17.04% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), IGF annualized +2.08% vs +9.55% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IGF or IVV?
IGF has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 15.7% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IGF -59.5% vs IVV -54.7%.
Should I hold both IGF and IVV?
IGF and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IGF and IVV?
33.3% of IGF's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 1.8% of IVV's is in holdings IGF also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 76 positions we hold weights for in IGF and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, IGF or IVV?
IGF yields 2.96% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IGF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than IGF?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.