IJAN vs VOO
IJAN vs VOO
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - January vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IJAN | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $258M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +7.41% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.21% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.32% | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.72% | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.4% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 1, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
IJAN vs VOO Performance
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - January (IJAN) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IJAN returned +13.21% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, IJAN is up 7.41% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Over three years, IJAN compounded at +10.32% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +7.72% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +7.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 10.4% for IJAN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.7% for IJAN and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IJAN charges 0.85% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IJAN currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for VOO.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IJAN or VOO?
IJAN has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IJAN or VOO?
Over the past year IJAN returned +13.21% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), IJAN annualized +7.19% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IJAN or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 10.4% for IJAN. Worst drawdown: IJAN -22.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both IJAN and VOO?
IJAN and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, IJAN or VOO?
IJAN yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.