IJH vs IVV
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IJH delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IJH | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.05% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $128.3B | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.19% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 413 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +14.69% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.74% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.30% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.80% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 22, 2000 | May 15, 2000 |
IJH vs IVV Performance
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IJH returned +21.74% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, IJH is up 14.69% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, IJH compounded at +15.30% per year against +21.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +8.80% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 26-year window we track, IJH has the edge at +8.72% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IJH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.1% for IJH and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IJH charges 0.05% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $3 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IJH currently yields 1.19% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IJH or IVV?
IJH has an expense ratio of 0.05% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $2 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IJH or IVV?
Over the past year IJH returned +21.74% vs +20.94% for IVV, so IJH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (26 years), IJH annualized +8.72% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IJH or IVV?
IJH has been the more volatile fund at 17.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IJH -56.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both IJH and IVV?
IJH and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IJH and IVV?
IJH and IVV share 2 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 898 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IJH or IVV?
IJH yields 1.19% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IJH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.