IJK vs VOO
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. IJK delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IJK | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.17% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $10.9B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.52% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 252 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +19.56% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.94% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.22% | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.46% | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -54.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 24, 2000 | Sep 7, 2010 |
IJK vs VOO Performance
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IJK returned +27.94% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, IJK is up 19.56% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Over three years, IJK compounded at +16.22% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +8.46% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +8.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IJK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.1% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -54.6% for IJK and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IJK charges 0.17% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $17 vs $3 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IJK currently yields 0.52% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
IJK and VOO share 0 holdings out of 752 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IJK or VOO?
IJK has an expense ratio of 0.17% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $14 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IJK or VOO?
Over the past year IJK returned +27.94% vs +23.71% for VOO, so IJK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), IJK annualized +8.15% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IJK or VOO?
IJK has been the more volatile fund at 18.1% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: IJK -54.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both IJK and VOO?
IJK and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IJK and VOO?
IJK and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 752 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IJK or VOO?
IJK yields 0.52% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.