ILS vs IVV
Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ILS | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.58% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $81M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.23% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 81 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +4.17% | +13.43% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.25% | +22.61% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | ILS ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 14, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
ILS vs IVV Performance
Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS) is a ETF from ILS ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ILS returned +8.25% while IVV returned +22.61%. Year to date, ILS is up 4.17% versus a gain of 13.43% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 2.6% for ILS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.6% for ILS and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.00. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ILS charges 1.58% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $158 vs $3 annually, a gap of $155 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ILS currently yields 8.23% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ILS and IVV share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ILS or IVV?
ILS has an expense ratio of 1.58% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $155 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ILS or IVV?
Over the past year ILS returned +8.25% vs +22.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ILS annualized +7.30% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ILS or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 2.6% for ILS. Worst drawdown: ILS -1.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ILS and IVV?
ILS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.00, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ILS and IVV?
ILS and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ILS or IVV?
ILS yields 8.23% while IVV yields 1.09%, so ILS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.