ILS vs VOO
Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ILS | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.58% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $81M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.23% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 81 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +3.70% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.82% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.6% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | ILS ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 14, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
ILS vs VOO Performance
Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS) is a ETF from ILS ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ILS returned +7.82% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, ILS is up 3.70% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 2.6% for ILS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.6% for ILS and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.00. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ILS charges 1.58% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $158 vs $3 annually, a gap of $155 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ILS currently yields 8.23% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
ILS and VOO share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ILS or VOO?
ILS has an expense ratio of 1.58% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $155 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ILS or VOO?
Over the past year ILS returned +7.82% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ILS annualized +7.00% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ILS or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 2.6% for ILS. Worst drawdown: ILS -1.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both ILS and VOO?
ILS and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.00, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ILS and VOO?
ILS and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ILS or VOO?
ILS yields 8.23% while VOO yields 1.09%, so ILS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.