ILS vs QQQ

ILS vs QQQ

Which is better, ILS or QQQ?

Intermediate Term Bond against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricILSQQQ
Expense Ratio1.58%0.18%Best
AUM$97M$483.5B
Dividend Yield8.00%0.44%
Holdings128107
YTD Return+6.26%+17.95%Best
1Y Return+8.41%+21.77%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+25.63%
5Y Return (annualized)-+15.24%
Volatility (annualized)2.8%Best19.7%
Max Drawdown-1.6%Best-12.6%
$10,000 over 1.5 years$11,260$15,425Best
Fund FamilyILS ETFsInvesco (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
StyleIntermediate Term BondLarge Cap Growth
InceptionMar 14, 2025Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 1, 2025 to Sep 17, 2026 (1.5 years).

ILS vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.

ILS vs QQQ Performance

Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS) is an ETF from ILS ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year ILS returned +8.41% while QQQ returned +21.77%. Year to date, ILS is up 6.26% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.7% compared with 2.8% for ILS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.6% for ILS and -12.6% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.00. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ILS charges 1.58% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $158 vs $18 annually, a gap of $140 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ILS currently yields 8.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 8 holdings in ILS and 102 in QQQ, totalling 6.4% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 8 positions we hold weights for in ILS and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 128 and 107.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of ILS and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

ILSQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ILS or QQQ?

ILS has an expense ratio of 1.58% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $140 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, ILS or QQQ?

Over the past year ILS returned +8.41% vs +21.77% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ILS annualized +8.23% vs +33.50% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, ILS or QQQ?

QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 19.7% annualized versus 2.8% for ILS. Worst drawdown: ILS -1.6% vs QQQ -12.6%.

Should I hold both ILS and QQQ?

ILS and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.00, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, ILS or QQQ?

ILS yields 8.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so ILS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than ILS?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.