ILS vs QQQ
Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. ILS offers more diversification with 128 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ILS | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.58% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $85M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.15% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 128 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +4.04% | +19.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.89% | +26.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.6% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.6% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | ILS ETFs | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 14, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
ILS vs QQQ Performance
Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS) is a ETF from ILS ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year ILS returned +7.89% while QQQ returned +26.68%. Year to date, ILS is up 4.04% versus a gain of 19.52% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 2.6% for ILS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.6% for ILS and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.04. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ILS charges 1.58% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $158 vs $18 annually, a gap of $140 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ILS currently yields 8.15% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
ILS and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 103 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ILS or QQQ?
ILS has an expense ratio of 1.58% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $140 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ILS or QQQ?
Over the past year ILS returned +7.89% vs +26.68% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ILS annualized +7.16% vs +13.14% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ILS or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 2.6% for ILS. Worst drawdown: ILS -1.6% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both ILS and QQQ?
ILS and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.04, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ILS and QQQ?
ILS and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 103 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ILS or QQQ?
ILS yields 8.15% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so ILS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.