IMF vs VTI
Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IMF | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $317M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.90% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 79 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +13.27% | +13.67% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.61% | +22.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 19, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
IMF vs VTI Performance
Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF (IMF) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IMF returned +19.61% while VTI returned +22.17%. Year to date, IMF is up 13.27% versus a gain of 13.67% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 12.1% for IMF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.1% for IMF and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.09. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IMF charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IMF currently yields 0.90% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
IMF and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IMF or VTI?
IMF has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IMF or VTI?
Over the past year IMF returned +19.61% vs +22.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IMF annualized +2.83% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IMF or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 12.1% for IMF. Worst drawdown: IMF -15.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IMF and VTI?
IMF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.09, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IMF and VTI?
IMF and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IMF or VTI?
IMF yields 0.90% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.