IMRA vs VTI
Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, IMRA or VTI?
Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IMRA | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.96% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 92.46% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 2 | 3,543 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 50.2% | 12.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -61.5% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $7,313 | $14,062Best |
| Fund Family | Bitwise | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 1, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 49 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. IMRA has data through Jul 31, 2026 and VTI through Sep 18, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 3, 2025 to Jul 31, 2026 (1.3 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IMRA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 50.2% compared with 12.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -61.5% for IMRA and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IMRA charges 0.96% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $96 vs $3 annually, a gap of $93 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IMRA currently yields 92.46% against 1.03% for VTI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IMRA and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IMRA or VTI?
IMRA has an expense ratio of 0.96% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $93 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, IMRA or VTI?
IMRA has been the more volatile fund at 50.2% annualized versus 12.6% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IMRA -61.5% vs VTI -8.9%.
Should I hold both IMRA and VTI?
IMRA and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IMRA or VTI?
IMRA yields 92.46% while VTI yields 1.03%, so IMRA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than IMRA?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.