IMTM vs IVV
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, IMTM or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IMTM led over 1Y and 3Y, IVV over 5Y and the full window. IMTM is less concentrated, with 22.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IMTM | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $4.2B | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.37% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 325 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +11.67% | +12.24%Best |
| 1Y Return | +19.74%Best | +18.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08%Best | +20.98% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.00% | +12.76%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.8%Best | 15.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -30.7%Best | -33.9% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,105 | $18,230Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.6%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 13, 2015 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 26, 2015 to Sep 9, 2026 (11.6 years).
IMTM vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.6 years both funds cover.
IMTM vs IVV Performance
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IMTM returned +19.74% while IVV returned +18.61%. Year to date, IMTM is up 11.67% versus a gain of 12.24% for IVV.
Over three years, IMTM compounded at +22.08% per year against +20.98% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +10.00% and +12.76% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +12.66% annualized vs +8.10%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.8% for IMTM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.7% for IMTM and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IMTM charges 0.30% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IMTM currently yields 4.37% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
2.0% of IMTM's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.2% of IVV's money is in holdings IMTM also owns.
IMTM and IVV share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 301 positions we hold weights for in IMTM and 505 in IVV, against full books of 325 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 493 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for IMTM (99.1% of the fund), and 7 for IMTM that do not appear in IVV (3.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IMTM and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IMTM or IVV?
IMTM has an expense ratio of 0.30% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IMTM or IVV?
Over the past year IMTM returned +19.74% vs +18.61% for IVV, so IMTM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), IMTM annualized +8.10% vs +12.66% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IMTM or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.8% for IMTM. Worst drawdown: IMTM -30.7% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both IMTM and IVV?
IMTM and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IMTM and IVV?
2.0% of IMTM's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.2% of IVV's is in holdings IMTM also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 301 positions we hold weights for in IMTM and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, IMTM or IVV?
IMTM yields 4.37% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IMTM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than IMTM?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IMTM led over 1Y and 3Y, IVV over 5Y and the full window. IMTM is less concentrated, with 22.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.