IPKW vs VTI
Invesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IPKW delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IPKW | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $539M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.62% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 178 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +12.03% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.47% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.24% | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.70% | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 24, 2014 | May 24, 2001 |
IPKW vs VTI Performance
Invesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF (IPKW) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IPKW returned +26.47% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, IPKW is up 12.03% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Over three years, IPKW compounded at +25.24% per year against +21.12% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.70% and +12.37% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, IPKW has the edge at +9.55% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IPKW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.3% for IPKW and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IPKW charges 0.55% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IPKW currently yields 3.62% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
IPKW and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2941 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IPKW | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CCCS | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IPKW or VTI?
IPKW has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IPKW or VTI?
Over the past year IPKW returned +26.47% vs +24.16% for VTI, so IPKW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), IPKW annualized +9.55% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IPKW or VTI?
IPKW has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IPKW -50.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IPKW and VTI?
IPKW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IPKW and VTI?
IPKW and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2941 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IPKW or VTI?
IPKW yields 3.62% while VTI yields 1.07%, so IPKW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.