IPKW vs VYM
Invesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. IPKW delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IPKW | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $539M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.62% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 178 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +12.03% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.47% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.24% | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.70% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.3% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 24, 2014 | Nov 10, 2006 |
IPKW vs VYM Performance
Invesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF (IPKW) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IPKW returned +26.47% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, IPKW is up 12.03% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Over three years, IPKW compounded at +25.24% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +11.70% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, IPKW has the edge at +9.55% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IPKW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.3% for IPKW and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IPKW charges 0.55% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $4 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IPKW currently yields 3.62% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
IPKW and VYM share 0 holdings out of 717 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IPKW or VYM?
IPKW has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $51 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IPKW or VYM?
Over the past year IPKW returned +26.47% vs +26.12% for VYM, so IPKW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), IPKW annualized +9.55% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IPKW or VYM?
IPKW has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: IPKW -50.3% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both IPKW and VYM?
IPKW and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IPKW and VYM?
IPKW and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 717 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IPKW or VYM?
IPKW yields 3.62% while VYM yields 2.86%, so IPKW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.