IPKW vs VOO
Invesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. IPKW delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IPKW | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $539M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.62% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 178 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +12.03% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.47% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.24% | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.70% | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 24, 2014 | Sep 7, 2010 |
IPKW vs VOO Performance
Invesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF (IPKW) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IPKW returned +26.47% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, IPKW is up 12.03% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Over three years, IPKW compounded at +25.24% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +11.70% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +9.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IPKW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.3% for IPKW and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IPKW charges 0.55% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IPKW currently yields 3.62% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
IPKW and VOO share 0 holdings out of 664 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IPKW or VOO?
IPKW has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IPKW or VOO?
Over the past year IPKW returned +26.47% vs +23.71% for VOO, so IPKW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), IPKW annualized +9.55% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IPKW or VOO?
IPKW has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: IPKW -50.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both IPKW and VOO?
IPKW and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IPKW and VOO?
IPKW and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 664 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IPKW or VOO?
IPKW yields 3.62% while VOO yields 1.09%, so IPKW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.