ISMD vs IVV
Inspire Small/Mid Cap ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ISMD delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ISMD | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.57% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $349M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.12% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 504 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +28.42% | +13.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +33.55% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.41% | +22.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.56% | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -45.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Inspire ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 27, 2017 | May 15, 2000 |
ISMD vs IVV Performance
Inspire Small/Mid Cap ETF (ISMD) is a ETF from Inspire ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ISMD returned +33.55% while IVV returned +21.62%. Year to date, ISMD is up 28.42% versus a gain of 13.22% for IVV.
Over three years, ISMD compounded at +17.41% per year against +22.17% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +10.56% and +13.42% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, ISMD has the edge at +9.29% annualized vs +7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ISMD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -45.5% for ISMD and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ISMD charges 0.57% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $3 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ISMD currently yields 1.12% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ISMD and IVV share 1 holdings out of 1002 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ISMD | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| IPGP | 0.14% | 0.62% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ISMD or IVV?
ISMD has an expense ratio of 0.57% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $54 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ISMD or IVV?
Over the past year ISMD returned +33.55% vs +21.62% for IVV, so ISMD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), ISMD annualized +9.29% vs +7.02% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ISMD or IVV?
ISMD has been the more volatile fund at 21.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ISMD -45.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ISMD and IVV?
ISMD and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ISMD and IVV?
ISMD and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1002 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ISMD or IVV?
ISMD yields 1.12% while IVV yields 1.10%, so ISMD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.