IVV vs IWR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF
Which is better, IVV or IWR?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, IWR over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. IWR is less concentrated, with 5.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | IWR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.18% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $56.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.13% |
| Holdings | 508 | 831 |
| YTD Return | +12.24% | +13.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | +18.61%Best | +15.82% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.98%Best | +16.61% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.76%Best | +7.69% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.0%Best | 17.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5%Best | -59.7% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,230Best | $14,484 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9% | 5.5%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 17, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 20, 2001 to Sep 9, 2026 (25.1 years).
IVV vs IWR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 25.1 years both funds cover.
IVV vs IWR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF (IWR) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IVV returned +18.61% while IWR returned +15.82%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.24% versus a gain of 13.57% for IWR.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.98% per year against +16.61% for IWR; over five years the annualized figures are +12.76% and +7.69% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, IWR has the edge at +8.63% annualized vs +7.94%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IWR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 15.0% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -59.7% for IWR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while IWR charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $18 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.13% for IWR.
Holdings Overlap
13.1% of IVV's money is in holdings IWR also owns. 60.0% of IWR's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
296 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 798 in IWR, against full books of 508 and 831.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 471 positions for IWR that do not appear in our book for IVV (35.4% of the fund), and 203 for IVV that do not appear in IWR (86.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in IWR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HOODRobinhood Markets Inc - A | 0.11% | 0.65% | 0.54% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc | 0.14% | 0.60% | 0.46% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 0.13% | 0.57% | 0.44% |
| PSXPhillips 66 | 0.12% | 0.51% | 0.39% |
| SPGSimon Property Group Inc | 0.11% | 0.52% | 0.41% |
| URIUnited Rentals Inc. | 0.11% | 0.49% | 0.38% |
| ALLAllstate Corp. | 0.10% | 0.46% | 0.36% |
| DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc. | 0.10% | 0.45% | 0.35% |
| WBDWarner Bros. Discovery, Inc | 0.10% | 0.45% | 0.35% |
| FIXComfort Systems Usa Inc | 0.09% | 0.45% | 0.36% |
60.0% of IWR is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or IWR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while IWR charges 0.18%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or IWR?
Over the past year IVV returned +18.61% vs +15.82% for IWR, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), IVV annualized +7.94% vs +8.63% for IWR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or IWR?
IWR has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 15.0% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs IWR -59.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and IWR?
IVV and IWR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and IWR?
60.0% of IWR's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 60.0% of IWR's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 296 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 798 in IWR.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or IWR?
IVV yields 1.06% while IWR yields 1.13%, so IWR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IWR better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, IWR over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. IWR is less concentrated, with 5.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.