IVV vs JHS
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs John Hancock Income Securities Trust
Which is better, IVV or JHS?
Large Cap Blend against Long Term High Quality.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | JHS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.66% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $144M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 5.15% |
| Holdings | 508 | 881 |
| YTD Return | +12.01%Best | -8.42% |
| 1Y Return | +16.48%Best | -7.11% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.21%Best | +4.21% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.95%Best | -3.74% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 10.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -47.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,384Best | $8,265 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | John Hancock Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Long Term High Quality |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 14, 1973 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 19, 2000 to Sep 14, 2026 (26.3 years).
IVV vs JHS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs JHS Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and John Hancock Income Securities Trust (JHS) is an ETF from John Hancock Investment Management. Over the past year IVV returned +16.48% while JHS returned -7.11%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.01% versus a loss of 8.42% for JHS.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.21% per year against +4.21% for JHS; over five years the annualized figures are +12.95% and -3.74% respectively. Across the full 26-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.95% annualized vs +0.32%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 10.8% for JHS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -47.8% for JHS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.32. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while JHS charges 1.66%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $166 annually, a gap of $163 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 5.15% for JHS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.2% of IVV's money is in holdings JHS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for JHS, our book for it covers 87.2% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
The two holdings books were reported 212 days apart, IVV as of Aug 31, 2026 and JHS as of Jan 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
2 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 518 in JHS, against full books of 508 and 881.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and JHS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or JHS?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while JHS charges 1.66%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $163 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or JHS?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.48% vs -7.11% for JHS, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (26 years), IVV annualized +6.95% vs +0.32% for JHS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or JHS?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 10.8% for JHS. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs JHS -47.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and JHS?
IVV and JHS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.32, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or JHS?
IVV yields 1.06% while JHS yields 5.15%, so JHS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is JHS better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.