IVV vs JMBS
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
Which is better, IVV or JMBS?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | JMBS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.21% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $6.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 5.74% |
| Holdings | 508 | 629 |
| YTD Return | +12.24%Best | -0.27% |
| 1Y Return | +18.61%Best | +1.31% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.98%Best | +5.03% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.76%Best | +0.43% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.9% | 5.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9% | -17.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,230Best | $10,217 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 55.4% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Janus Henderson Investors |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | - |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 12, 2018 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 13, 2018 to Sep 9, 2026 (8 years).
IVV vs JMBS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs JMBS Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS) is an ETF from Janus Henderson Investors. Over the past year IVV returned +18.61% while JMBS returned +1.31%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.24% versus a loss of 0.27% for JMBS.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.98% per year against +5.03% for JMBS; over five years the annualized figures are +12.76% and +0.43% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.88% annualized vs +1.14%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 5.8% for JMBS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -17.0% for JMBS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while JMBS charges 0.21%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $21 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 5.74% for JMBS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 505 holdings in IVV and 374 in JMBS, totalling 100.0% and 97.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 374 in JMBS, against full books of 508 and 629.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 272 positions for JMBS that do not appear in our book for IVV (97.9% of the fund), and 496 for IVV that do not appear in JMBS (99.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and JMBS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or JMBS?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while JMBS charges 0.21%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $18 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or JMBS?
Over the past year IVV returned +18.61% vs +1.31% for JMBS, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), IVV annualized +13.88% vs +1.14% for JMBS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or JMBS?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 5.8% for JMBS. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs JMBS -17.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and JMBS?
IVV and JMBS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or JMBS?
IVV yields 1.06% while JMBS yields 5.74%, so JMBS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is JMBS better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.