IVV vs JULZ
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs TrueShares Structured Outcome (July) ETF
Which is better, IVV or JULZ?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | JULZ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.79% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $39M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 5.54% |
| Holdings | 508 | 7 |
| YTD Return | +12.27%Best | +9.12% |
| 1Y Return | +17.04%Best | +0.44% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.24%Best | +11.44% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.08%Best | +8.12% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.5% | 12.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.5% | -17.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,490Best | $14,775 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | TrueShares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 30, 2020 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 1, 2020 to Sep 17, 2026 (6.2 years).
IVV vs JULZ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.2 years both funds cover.
IVV vs JULZ Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) is an ETF from TrueShares. Over the past year IVV returned +17.04% while JULZ returned +0.44%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.27% versus a gain of 9.12% for JULZ.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.24% per year against +11.44% for JULZ; over five years the annualized figures are +13.08% and +8.12% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +17.01% annualized vs +11.46%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 12.4% for JULZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.5% for IVV and -17.4% for JULZ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while JULZ charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $79 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 5.54% for JULZ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 490 holdings in IVV and 1 in JULZ, totalling 99.3% and 0.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 1 in JULZ, against full books of 508 and 7.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and JULZ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or JULZ?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while JULZ charges 0.79%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or JULZ?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.04% vs +0.44% for JULZ, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), IVV annualized +17.01% vs +11.46% for JULZ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or JULZ?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 12.4% for JULZ. Worst drawdown: IVV -24.5% vs JULZ -17.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and JULZ?
IVV and JULZ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or JULZ?
IVV yields 1.06% while JULZ yields 5.54%, so JULZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is JULZ better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.