JULZ vs VYM
JULZ vs VYM
TrueShares Structured Outcome (July) ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JULZ | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $36M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.65% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +10.45% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.12% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.67% | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.38% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.4% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | TrueShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 30, 2020 | Nov 10, 2006 |
JULZ vs VYM Performance
TrueShares Structured Outcome (July) ETF (JULZ) is a ETF from TrueShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year JULZ returned +5.12% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, JULZ is up 10.45% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Over three years, JULZ compounded at +11.67% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +8.38% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, JULZ has the edge at +11.90% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 12.5% for JULZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.4% for JULZ and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JULZ charges 0.79% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $4 annually, a gap of $75 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JULZ currently yields 5.65% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
JULZ and VYM share 0 holdings out of 560 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JULZ or VYM?
JULZ has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $75 per year of difference.
Which performed better, JULZ or VYM?
Over the past year JULZ returned +5.12% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), JULZ annualized +11.90% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, JULZ or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 12.5% for JULZ. Worst drawdown: JULZ -17.4% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both JULZ and VYM?
JULZ and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between JULZ and VYM?
JULZ and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 560 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, JULZ or VYM?
JULZ yields 5.65% while VYM yields 2.86%, so JULZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.