IVV vs KEMQ
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs KraneShares Public-Private Emerging Markets Internet and Technology ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | KEMQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.49% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $26M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 5.24% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 67 | |
| YTD Return | +12.39% | -0.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.24% | +13.66% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.78% | +23.63% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.84% | -1.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 24.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -70.7% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | KraneShares | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 11, 2017 |
IVV vs KEMQ Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and KraneShares Public-Private Emerging Markets Internet and Technology ETF (KEMQ) is a ETF from KraneShares. Over the past year IVV returned +20.24% while KEMQ returned +13.66%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a loss of 0.16% for KEMQ.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.78% per year against +23.63% for KEMQ; over five years the annualized figures are +12.84% and -1.26% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs +1.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KEMQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -70.7% for KEMQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while KEMQ charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $49 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 5.24% for KEMQ.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and KEMQ share 0 holdings out of 558 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or KEMQ?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while KEMQ charges 0.49%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or KEMQ?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.24% vs +13.66% for KEMQ, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs +1.43% for KEMQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or KEMQ?
KEMQ has been the more volatile fund at 24.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs KEMQ -70.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and KEMQ?
IVV and KEMQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and KEMQ?
IVV and KEMQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 558 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or KEMQ?
IVV yields 1.10% while KEMQ yields 5.24%, so KEMQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.