KEMQ vs VYM
KraneShares Public-Private Emerging Markets Internet and Technology ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KEMQ | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $26M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.24% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 67 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +1.25% | +15.34% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.29% | +23.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.38% | +19.22% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.00% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -70.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 11, 2017 | Nov 10, 2006 |
KEMQ vs VYM Performance
KraneShares Public-Private Emerging Markets Internet and Technology ETF (KEMQ) is a ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KEMQ returned +18.29% while VYM returned +23.24%. Year to date, KEMQ is up 1.25% versus a gain of 15.34% for VYM.
Over three years, KEMQ compounded at +24.38% per year against +19.22% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +0.00% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +1.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KEMQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.5% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -70.7% for KEMQ and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KEMQ charges 0.49% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $4 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KEMQ currently yields 5.24% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
KEMQ and VYM share 0 holdings out of 656 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KEMQ or VYM?
KEMQ has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KEMQ or VYM?
Over the past year KEMQ returned +18.29% vs +23.24% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), KEMQ annualized +1.59% vs +7.04% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KEMQ or VYM?
KEMQ has been the more volatile fund at 24.5% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: KEMQ -70.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both KEMQ and VYM?
KEMQ and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KEMQ and VYM?
KEMQ and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 656 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KEMQ or VYM?
KEMQ yields 5.24% while VYM yields 2.24%, so KEMQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.