KEMQ vs SCHD
KraneShares Public-Private Emerging Markets Internet and Technology ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KEMQ | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $26M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.24% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 67 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +2.35% | +26.54% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.75% | +30.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.81% | +16.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.18% | +9.65% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.5% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -70.7% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 11, 2017 | Oct 20, 2011 |
KEMQ vs SCHD Performance
KraneShares Public-Private Emerging Markets Internet and Technology ETF (KEMQ) is a ETF from KraneShares and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year KEMQ returned +19.75% while SCHD returned +30.90%. Year to date, KEMQ is up 2.35% versus a gain of 26.54% for SCHD.
Over three years, KEMQ compounded at +23.81% per year against +16.29% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are -0.18% and +9.65% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.51% annualized vs +1.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KEMQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.5% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -70.7% for KEMQ and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KEMQ charges 0.49% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $6 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KEMQ currently yields 5.24% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
KEMQ and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 153 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KEMQ or SCHD?
KEMQ has an expense ratio of 0.49% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $43 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KEMQ or SCHD?
Over the past year KEMQ returned +19.75% vs +30.90% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), KEMQ annualized +1.72% vs +11.51% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KEMQ or SCHD?
KEMQ has been the more volatile fund at 24.5% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: KEMQ -70.7% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both KEMQ and SCHD?
KEMQ and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KEMQ and SCHD?
KEMQ and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 153 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KEMQ or SCHD?
KEMQ yields 5.24% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so KEMQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.