IVV vs LRCU
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. LRCU delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | LRCU | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.30% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $49M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 4 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | -33.32% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +110.75% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 170.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -80.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Tradr ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 18, 2025 |
IVV vs LRCU Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) is a ETF from Tradr ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while LRCU returned +110.75%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a loss of 33.32% for LRCU.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LRCU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 170.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -80.0% for LRCU. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while LRCU charges 1.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $130 annually, a gap of $127 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.00% for LRCU.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and LRCU share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or LRCU?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while LRCU charges 1.30%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $127 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or LRCU?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +110.75% for LRCU, so LRCU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +102.06% for LRCU. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or LRCU?
LRCU has been the more volatile fund at 170.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs LRCU -80.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and LRCU?
IVV and LRCU have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and LRCU?
IVV and LRCU share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or LRCU?
IVV yields 1.10% while LRCU yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.